The Consequences of Chernobyl's Disaster and the New Policy of Social Dissertation

The Consequences of Chernobyl's Disaster and the New Policy of Social Defense - Dissertation Example he Chernobyl Disaster 31 Social Defence in the EU following the Chernobyl Disaster 34 Social Defence in the UK following the Chernobyl Disaster 37 Part IV 42 Conclusion 42 Strengths of the Research 44 Limitations of the Research 44 Suggestions for Further Research 45 Bibliography 45 Part I Introduction The Chernobyl accident and its resulting disaster in 1986 illustrates that even the most careful planning on a domestic level will not minimize or remove the risks attending all states with respect to nuclear power plants. The risks associated with nuclear power plants are far more serious than the specific risks revealed by the Chernobyl accident. Essentially, the Chernobyl accident revealed that an innocent accident lacking malicious intent can bring about disaster that goes far beyond the vicinity of the accident itself.4 Separate and apart from accidental damages, even the ordinary functioning of nuclear power plants can create disasters. After all, workers are managing and handlin g dangerous material such as plutonium and uranium which can be deliberately transferred to rogue nations or terrorist for â€Å"non-peaceful use†.5 Moreover, there is always the possibility of military assaults on power plants and deliberate sabotage. Consequences of any of these actions were brought to the fore by the Chernobyl accident.6 The Chernobyl disaster essentially resurrected the debate over nuclear power and managing nuclear power. These controversies drew attention to the risk associated with the proliferation of nuclear weapons, nuclear power plant accidents, repositories for nuclear waste, and environmental and health issues attending radiation fallout.7 More importantly, the Chernobyl symbolized a â€Å"high risk society† in which no one can escape â€Å"man-made disasters† and... The objective of this research is to acquire a better insight the Chernobyl accident and its resulting disaster in 1986. It illustrates that even the most careful planning on a domestic level will not minimize or remove the risks attending all states with respect to nuclear power plants. The risks associated with nuclear power plants are far more serious than the specific risks revealed by the Chernobyl accident. Essentially, the Chernobyl accident revealed that an innocent accident lacking malicious intent can bring about disaster that goes far beyond the vicinity of the accident itself. Separate and apart from accidental damages, even the ordinary functioning of nuclear power plants can create disasters. After all, workers are managing and handling dangerous material such as plutonium and uranium which can be deliberately transferred to rogue nations or terrorist for â€Å"non-peaceful use†. Moreover, there is always the possibility of military assaults on power plants and d eliberate sabotage. Consequences of any of these actions were brought to the fore by the Chernobyl accident. The Chernobyl disaster essentially resurrected the debate over nuclear power and managing nuclear power. These controversies drew attention to the risk associated with the proliferation of nuclear weapons, nuclear power plant accidents, repositories for nuclear waste, and environmental and health issues attending radiation fallout. More importantly, the Chernobyl symbolized a â€Å"high risk society† in which no one can escape â€Å"man-made disasters† and that these disasters are not confined to time and space.

Socrates on Unexamined Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Socrates on Unexamined Life - Essay Example Socrates insistence on this claim portrays that human beings are born or called to reflect upon their beliefs, speak to seek out, account for what they do not know and know, live accordance to their views and defend those beliefs that make a meaningful and well-lived life. Socrates was right to make this claim (Plato, 2015). It follows human nature to live examined lives. For instance, we naturally live by the directions of pain and pleasure. Human beings are naturally drawn to the forces of wealth, power, and reputation. Socrates’ call to live an examined life does not necessarily show insistence to reject such inclinations and motivations (Plato, 2009). Instead, his claim was an injunction to appraise the true worth of the human soul. He believed that people should live by reflections upon their everyday values and motivations, and most importantly, to inquire knowledge into the real world and worth. Subsequently, if there is any. In case there is no value, it is upon the pe ople to pursue the things that they believe are truly valuable.Socrates’ thoughts on examining life prepare one to be as good, as he or she could. During his jurisdictions, he examines the lives of the juror. Socrates, who awaited prosecution at that time, ends up being the prosecutor when he surreptitiously accuses those behind his conviction and sentences him of failing to live a good life that respects humanity (Plato, 2009). He challenges them that they would never escape from self-examination just by executing him.